Requesty

gemini-3.5-flash vs kimi-k2

Side-by-side comparison of gemini-3.5-flash and kimi-k2: benchmarks, pricing, context window and capabilities. Both are accessible through Requesty's unified API.

Pricing & specifications

gemini-3.5-flashkimi-k2
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.60
Output price / 1M$9.00$2.50
Context window1.0M tokens262K tokens
Max output66K tokens262K tokens
Vision inputYesN/A
Tool callingYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Prompt cachingYesYes
Computer useN/AN/A
ProviderGoogle Gemini APIGoogle Vertex AI

Questions people ask

Is gemini-3.5-flash better than kimi-k2?
Benchmark data is limited for one or both models. Compare pricing and capabilities in the tables above, and test both on your own workload.
Which is cheaper, gemini-3.5-flash or kimi-k2?
kimi-k2 is cheaper. gemini-3.5-flash costs $1.50/$9.00 per 1M input/output tokens, while kimi-k2 costs $0.60/$2.50.
Can I use gemini-3.5-flash and kimi-k2 through the same API?
Yes. Requesty provides a single OpenAI-compatible API that routes to both. Change just the "model" parameter to switch between "google/gemini-3.5-flash" and "vertex/kimi-k2", no other code changes needed.
What are the context windows?
gemini-3.5-flash supports up to 1.0M tokens of context. kimi-k2 supports up to 262K tokens. Longer context means you can feed larger documents or codebases in a single prompt, though quality often degrades past 128K for most models.

Switch between gemini-3.5-flash and kimi-k2 with one line of code

Requesty provides a single OpenAI-compatible API for 600+ models. Change the model parameter, not your code.