Qwen/Qwen3-Max vs kimi-k2.7-code
Side-by-side comparison of Qwen/Qwen3-Max and kimi-k2.7-code: benchmarks, pricing, context window and capabilities. Both are accessible through Requesty's unified API.
Qwen/Qwen3-Max
Input / 1M
$1.20
Output / 1M
$6.00
Context
256K
Model ID
deepinfra/Qwen/Qwen3-Max
kimi-k2.7-code
Input / 1M
$0.95
Output / 1M
$4.00
Context
262K
Model ID
moonshot/kimi-k2.7-code
Pricing & specifications
| Qwen/Qwen3-Max | kimi-k2.7-code | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.20 | $0.95 |
| Output price / 1M | $6.00 | $4.00 |
| Context window | 256K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Max output | N/A | 262K tokens |
| Vision input | N/A | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Prompt caching | Yes | Yes |
| Computer use | N/A | N/A |
| Provider | DeepInfra | Moonshot AI |
Questions people ask
Is Qwen/Qwen3-Max better than kimi-k2.7-code?
Benchmark data is limited for one or both models. Compare pricing and capabilities in the tables above, and test both on your own workload.
Which is cheaper, Qwen/Qwen3-Max or kimi-k2.7-code?
kimi-k2.7-code is cheaper. Qwen/Qwen3-Max costs $1.20/$6.00 per 1M input/output tokens, while kimi-k2.7-code costs $0.95/$4.00.
Can I use Qwen/Qwen3-Max and kimi-k2.7-code through the same API?
Yes. Requesty provides a single OpenAI-compatible API that routes to both. Change just the "model" parameter to switch between "deepinfra/Qwen/Qwen3-Max" and "moonshot/kimi-k2.7-code", no other code changes needed.
What are the context windows?
Qwen/Qwen3-Max supports up to 256K tokens of context. kimi-k2.7-code supports up to 262K tokens. Longer context means you can feed larger documents or codebases in a single prompt, though quality often degrades past 128K for most models.
Switch between Qwen/Qwen3-Max and kimi-k2.7-code with one line of code
Requesty provides a single OpenAI-compatible API for 600+ models. Change the model parameter, not your code.