moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5 vs Qwen/Qwen3-Max
Side-by-side comparison of moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5 and Qwen/Qwen3-Max: benchmarks, pricing, context window and capabilities. Both are accessible through Requesty's unified API.
moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5
Input / 1M
$0.45
Output / 1M
$2.25
Context
262K
Model ID
deepinfra/moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5
Qwen/Qwen3-Max
Input / 1M
$1.20
Output / 1M
$6.00
Context
256K
Model ID
deepinfra/Qwen/Qwen3-Max
Pricing & specifications
| moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5 | Qwen/Qwen3-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.45 | $1.20 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.25 | $6.00 |
| Context window | 262K tokens | 256K tokens |
| Max output | 131K tokens | N/A |
| Vision input | Yes | N/A |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Prompt caching | Yes | Yes |
| Computer use | N/A | N/A |
| Provider | DeepInfra | DeepInfra |
Questions people ask
Is moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5 better than Qwen/Qwen3-Max?
Benchmark data is limited for one or both models. Compare pricing and capabilities in the tables above, and test both on your own workload.
Which is cheaper, moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5 or Qwen/Qwen3-Max?
moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5 is cheaper. moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5 costs $0.45/$2.25 per 1M input/output tokens, while Qwen/Qwen3-Max costs $1.20/$6.00.
Can I use moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5 and Qwen/Qwen3-Max through the same API?
Yes. Requesty provides a single OpenAI-compatible API that routes to both. Change just the "model" parameter to switch between "deepinfra/moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5" and "deepinfra/Qwen/Qwen3-Max", no other code changes needed.
What are the context windows?
moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5 supports up to 262K tokens of context. Qwen/Qwen3-Max supports up to 256K tokens. Longer context means you can feed larger documents or codebases in a single prompt, though quality often degrades past 128K for most models.
Switch between moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5 and Qwen/Qwen3-Max with one line of code
Requesty provides a single OpenAI-compatible API for 600+ models. Change the model parameter, not your code.