ByteDance/Seed-2.0-pro vs Qwen/Qwen3-Max
Side-by-side comparison of ByteDance/Seed-2.0-pro and Qwen/Qwen3-Max: benchmarks, pricing, context window and capabilities. Both are accessible through Requesty's unified API.
ByteDance/Seed-2.0-pro
Input / 1M
$0.50
Output / 1M
$3.00
Context
256K
Model ID
deepinfra/ByteDance/Seed-2.0-pro
Qwen/Qwen3-Max
Input / 1M
$1.20
Output / 1M
$6.00
Context
256K
Model ID
deepinfra/Qwen/Qwen3-Max
Pricing & specifications
| ByteDance/Seed-2.0-pro | Qwen/Qwen3-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.50 | $1.20 |
| Output price / 1M | $3.00 | $6.00 |
| Context window | 256K tokens | 256K tokens |
| Max output | N/A | N/A |
| Vision input | Yes | N/A |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Prompt caching | Yes | Yes |
| Computer use | N/A | N/A |
| Provider | DeepInfra | DeepInfra |
Questions people ask
Is ByteDance/Seed-2.0-pro better than Qwen/Qwen3-Max?
Benchmark data is limited for one or both models. Compare pricing and capabilities in the tables above, and test both on your own workload.
Which is cheaper, ByteDance/Seed-2.0-pro or Qwen/Qwen3-Max?
ByteDance/Seed-2.0-pro is cheaper. ByteDance/Seed-2.0-pro costs $0.50/$3.00 per 1M input/output tokens, while Qwen/Qwen3-Max costs $1.20/$6.00.
Can I use ByteDance/Seed-2.0-pro and Qwen/Qwen3-Max through the same API?
Yes. Requesty provides a single OpenAI-compatible API that routes to both. Change just the "model" parameter to switch between "deepinfra/ByteDance/Seed-2.0-pro" and "deepinfra/Qwen/Qwen3-Max", no other code changes needed.
What are the context windows?
ByteDance/Seed-2.0-pro supports up to 256K tokens of context. Qwen/Qwen3-Max supports up to 256K tokens. Longer context means you can feed larger documents or codebases in a single prompt, though quality often degrades past 128K for most models.
Switch between ByteDance/Seed-2.0-pro and Qwen/Qwen3-Max with one line of code
Requesty provides a single OpenAI-compatible API for 600+ models. Change the model parameter, not your code.