claude-opus-4-7 vs moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5
Side-by-side comparison of claude-opus-4-7 and moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5: benchmarks, pricing, context window and capabilities. Both are accessible through Requesty's unified API.
claude-opus-4-7
Input / 1M
$5.00
Output / 1M
$25.00
Context
1M
Model ID
anthropic/claude-opus-4-7
moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5
Input / 1M
$0.45
Output / 1M
$2.25
Context
262K
Model ID
deepinfra/moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5
Pricing & specifications
| claude-opus-4-7 | moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $5.00 | $0.45 |
| Output price / 1M | $25.00 | $2.25 |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 262K tokens |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 131K tokens |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Prompt caching | Yes | Yes |
| Computer use | Yes | N/A |
| Provider | Anthropic | DeepInfra |
Questions people ask
Is claude-opus-4-7 better than moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5?
Benchmark data is limited for one or both models. Compare pricing and capabilities in the tables above, and test both on your own workload.
Which is cheaper, claude-opus-4-7 or moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5?
moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5 is cheaper. claude-opus-4-7 costs $5.00/$25.00 per 1M input/output tokens, while moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5 costs $0.45/$2.25.
Can I use claude-opus-4-7 and moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5 through the same API?
Yes. Requesty provides a single OpenAI-compatible API that routes to both. Change just the "model" parameter to switch between "anthropic/claude-opus-4-7" and "deepinfra/moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5", no other code changes needed.
What are the context windows?
claude-opus-4-7 supports up to 1M tokens of context. moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5 supports up to 262K tokens. Longer context means you can feed larger documents or codebases in a single prompt, though quality often degrades past 128K for most models.
Switch between claude-opus-4-7 and moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5 with one line of code
Requesty provides a single OpenAI-compatible API for 600+ models. Change the model parameter, not your code.