qwen3.7-plus vs Qwen/Qwen3-Max
Side-by-side comparison of qwen3.7-plus and Qwen/Qwen3-Max: benchmarks, pricing, context window and capabilities. Both are accessible through Requesty's unified API.
qwen3.7-plus
Input / 1M
$0.40$0.32
Output / 1M
$1.60$1.28
Context
1.0M
Model ID
alibaba/qwen3.7-plus
Qwen/Qwen3-Max
Input / 1M
$1.20
Output / 1M
$6.00
Context
256K
Model ID
deepinfra/Qwen/Qwen3-Max
Pricing & specifications
| qwen3.7-plus | Qwen/Qwen3-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.40$0.32 | $1.20 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.60$1.28 | $6.00 |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 256K tokens |
| Max output | 131K tokens | N/A |
| Vision input | Yes | N/A |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Prompt caching | Yes | Yes |
| Computer use | N/A | N/A |
| Provider | Alibaba Cloud | DeepInfra |
Questions people ask
Is qwen3.7-plus better than Qwen/Qwen3-Max?
Benchmark data is limited for one or both models. Compare pricing and capabilities in the tables above, and test both on your own workload.
Which is cheaper, qwen3.7-plus or Qwen/Qwen3-Max?
qwen3.7-plus is cheaper. qwen3.7-plus costs $0.32/$1.28 per 1M input/output tokens, while Qwen/Qwen3-Max costs $1.20/$6.00. The prices shown are what you pay: qwen3.7-plus runs at 20% off its list rate of $0.40 per 1M input and $1.60 per 1M output.
Can I use qwen3.7-plus and Qwen/Qwen3-Max through the same API?
Yes. Requesty provides a single OpenAI-compatible API that routes to both. Change just the "model" parameter to switch between "alibaba/qwen3.7-plus" and "deepinfra/Qwen/Qwen3-Max", no other code changes needed.
What are the context windows?
qwen3.7-plus supports up to 1.0M tokens of context. Qwen/Qwen3-Max supports up to 256K tokens. Longer context means you can feed larger documents or codebases in a single prompt, though quality often degrades past 128K for most models.
Switch between qwen3.7-plus and Qwen/Qwen3-Max with one line of code
Requesty provides a single OpenAI-compatible API for 600+ models. Change the model parameter, not your code.