qwen3.7-max vs moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5
Side-by-side comparison of qwen3.7-max and moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5: benchmarks, pricing, context window and capabilities. Both are accessible through Requesty's unified API.
qwen3.7-max
Input / 1M
$2.50
Output / 1M
$7.50
Context
1.0M
Model ID
alibaba/qwen3.7-max
moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5
Input / 1M
$0.45
Output / 1M
$2.25
Context
262K
Model ID
deepinfra/moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5
Pricing & specifications
| qwen3.7-max | moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.45 |
| Output price / 1M | $7.50 | $2.25 |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 262K tokens |
| Max output | 131K tokens | 131K tokens |
| Vision input | N/A | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Prompt caching | Yes | Yes |
| Computer use | N/A | N/A |
| Provider | Alibaba Cloud | DeepInfra |
Questions people ask
Is qwen3.7-max better than moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5?
Benchmark data is limited for one or both models. Compare pricing and capabilities in the tables above, and test both on your own workload.
Which is cheaper, qwen3.7-max or moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5?
moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5 is cheaper. qwen3.7-max costs $2.50/$7.50 per 1M input/output tokens, while moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5 costs $0.45/$2.25.
Can I use qwen3.7-max and moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5 through the same API?
Yes. Requesty provides a single OpenAI-compatible API that routes to both. Change just the "model" parameter to switch between "alibaba/qwen3.7-max" and "deepinfra/moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5", no other code changes needed.
What are the context windows?
qwen3.7-max supports up to 1.0M tokens of context. moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5 supports up to 262K tokens. Longer context means you can feed larger documents or codebases in a single prompt, though quality often degrades past 128K for most models.
Switch between qwen3.7-max and moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5 with one line of code
Requesty provides a single OpenAI-compatible API for 600+ models. Change the model parameter, not your code.