Requesty
Requesty coding benchmark/updated 29 Oct 2026/129 private tasks/25 models

Which models ship real backend code, how fast, and at what price.

We gave every model the same coding agent and 129 private tasks from our own Go backend, then checked the work against hidden tests the model never sees.

Top 5
  1. 1claude-opus-5-592%
  2. 2claude-fable-5.189%
  3. 3gemini-4-argon88%
  4. 4claude-sonnet-5-588%
  5. 5gpt-6-astra88%
Leaderboard

Pick a metric

Same tasks, same agent, same 80 turn budget. Switch between score, speed, effort, tokens and cost.

Tasks solved is the headline score: a task only counts when every hidden test for it passes.
Tests passed is partial credit: the share of hidden tests passed, averaged over all tasks, so a near miss still counts.
Tasks solved, higher is better
  1. 1claude-opus-5-592%
  2. 2claude-fable-5.189%
  3. 3gemini-4-argon88%
  4. 4claude-sonnet-5-588%
  5. 5gpt-6-astra88%
  6. 6gpt-6.1-sol87%
  7. 7gpt-6.1-terra83%
  8. 8claude-haiku-5-581%
  9. 9kimi-k3.1-pro81%
  10. 10mistral-large-4open78%
  11. 11deepseek-v4.1-flashopen77%
  12. 12gpt-6-sol76%
  13. 13hy4-previewopen74%
  14. 14grok-4.774%
  15. 15kimi-k3open72%
  16. 16particle-171%
  17. 17muse-spark-openopen71%
  18. 18qwen3.8-flash70%
  19. 19deepseek-v4-proopen68%
  20. 20glm-5.3open67%
  21. 21minimax-m3.1-flashopen67%
  22. 22muse-spark-1.366%
  23. 23gpt-6-luna65%
  24. 24glm-5.3-flashopen64%
  25. 25step-5-previewopen57%
Speed

Smart or fast? Every model on one map

Tasks solved against median seconds per model turn. Top right is where you want to be. The dashed line is the Pareto frontier: models where nothing else is both faster and better.

50%75%100%Tasks solved (up is better)2.0s4.0s6.0s8.0s10.0sMedian seconds per model turn (faster to the right)claude-opus-5-5claude-fable-5.1gemini-4-argonclaude-sonnet-5-5gpt-6-astragpt-6.1-solgpt-6.1-terraclaude-haiku-5-5kimi-k3.1-promistral-large-4deepseek-v4.1-flashgpt-6-solhy4-previewgrok-4.7kimi-k3particle-1muse-spark-openqwen3.8-flashdeepseek-v4-proglm-5.3minimax-m3.1-flashmuse-spark-1.3gpt-6-lunaglm-5.3-flashstep-5-preview
Pareto frontier: no other model scores higher and is also fasterHover a dot for its numbers

Output tokens per second

  1. 1gemini-4-argon264
  2. 2particle-1232
  3. 3claude-haiku-5-5186
  4. 4minimax-m3.1-flashopen185
  5. 5muse-spark-1.3153
  6. 6deepseek-v4.1-flashopen152
  7. 7glm-5.3-flashopen132
  8. 8claude-sonnet-5-5129
  9. 9mistral-large-4open87
  10. 10glm-5.3open87

Fewest agent turns per task

  1. 1claude-sonnet-5-513
  2. 2claude-opus-5-519
  3. 3claude-haiku-5-520
  4. 4gpt-6.1-sol28
  5. 5gpt-6-astra30
  6. 6muse-spark-1.331
  7. 7gemini-4-argon31
  8. 8claude-fable-5.132
  9. 9gpt-6.1-terra32
  10. 10gpt-6-sol34
Price

What a solved task costs

List prices from the Requesty catalogue and the measured cost of each run. Cheaper per token does not always mean cheaper per solved task. The dashed line is the Pareto frontier.

50%75%100%Tasks solved (up is better)$0.10$0.20$0.50$1.00$2.00Cost per solved task, log scale (cheaper to the right)claude-opus-5-5claude-fable-5.1gemini-4-argonclaude-sonnet-5-5gpt-6-astragpt-6.1-solgpt-6.1-terraclaude-haiku-5-5kimi-k3.1-promistral-large-4deepseek-v4.1-flashgpt-6-solhy4-previewgrok-4.7kimi-k3particle-1muse-spark-openqwen3.8-flashdeepseek-v4-proglm-5.3minimax-m3.1-flashmuse-spark-1.3gpt-6-lunaglm-5.3-flashstep-5-preview
Pareto frontier: no other model scores higher and is also cheaperHover a dot for its numbers
#Model
1gpt-6-lunaOpenAI65%$0.10$0.50$0.05$0.0722 Sept 202620 Oct 2026
2qwen3.8-flashAlibaba70%$0.16$0.47$0.05$0.0826 Aug 202620 Oct 2026
3claude-haiku-5-5Anthropic81%$0.10$0.50$0.11$0.147 Oct 202620 Oct 2026
4gpt-6.1-terraOpenAI83%$1.00$5.00$0.16$0.1926 Oct 202630 Oct 2026
5particle-1Particle71%$0.25$1.00$0.19$0.2729 Oct 202630 Oct 2026
6gpt-6.1-solOpenAI87%$2.00$10$0.26$0.3029 Sept 202620 Oct 2026
7glm-5.3-flashZhipuopen64%$0.12$0.46$0.24$0.3826 Aug 202620 Oct 2026
8deepseek-v4.1-flashDeepSeekopen77%$0.15$0.60$0.31$0.4110 Sept 202620 Oct 2026
9step-5-previewStepFunopen57%$1.00$2.70$0.28$0.488 Oct 202630 Oct 2026
10hy4-previewTencentopen74%$0.83$2.50$0.38$0.5128 Aug 202620 Oct 2026
11minimax-m3.1-flashMiniMaxopen67%$0.15$0.60$0.37$0.5519 Oct 202630 Oct 2026
12claude-sonnet-5-5Anthropic88%$2.00$10$0.52$0.5928 Sept 202620 Oct 2026
13gpt-6-solOpenAI76%$2.00$10$0.54$0.7122 Sept 202620 Oct 2026
14muse-spark-openMetaopen71%$1.25$4.25$0.61$0.8715 Oct 202630 Oct 2026
15claude-opus-5-5Anthropic92%$4.00$20$0.93$1.0122 Sept 202620 Oct 2026
16kimi-k3.1-proMoonshot81%$2.00$10$0.85$1.0423 Oct 202630 Oct 2026
17muse-spark-1.3Meta66%$1.25$4.25$0.99$1.5012 Oct 202630 Oct 2026
18glm-5.3Zhipuopen67%$1.14$3.42$1.46$2.1618 Aug 202620 Oct 2026
19grok-4.7xAI74%$2.00$6.00$1.71$2.3221 Sept 202620 Oct 2026
20kimi-k3Moonshotopen72%$3.00$15$1.72$2.3916 Jul 202620 Oct 2026
21gpt-6-astraOpenAI88%$10$50$2.11$2.404 Sept 202620 Oct 2026
22gemini-4-argonGoogle88%$2.00$10$2.14$2.4313 Oct 202620 Oct 2026
23deepseek-v4-proDeepSeekopen68%$1.75$3.50$1.82$2.6624 Apr 202620 Oct 2026
24mistral-large-4Mistralopen78%$0.68$2.09$2.36$3.046 Oct 202629 Oct 2026
25claude-fable-5.1Anthropic89%$10$50$3.48$3.901 Sept 202620 Oct 2026
Difficulty

Where models start to break

Share of tasks solved at each level. Easy and medium are nearly solved; extra hard and extreme separate the field.

Modeleasymediumhardxhardxtremeall
claude-opus-5-593%100%97%87%78%92%
claude-fable-5.1100%100%97%80%61%89%
gemini-4-argon93%100%100%80%56%88%
claude-sonnet-5-5100%100%97%70%67%88%
gpt-6-astra100%100%97%73%61%88%
gpt-6.1-sol100%100%97%67%67%87%
gpt-6.1-terra100%100%92%70%44%83%
claude-haiku-5-5100%100%87%63%56%81%
kimi-k3.1-pro93%93%100%67%39%81%
mistral-large-493%100%95%60%22%78%
deepseek-v4.1-flash93%100%97%57%17%77%
gpt-6-sol93%96%90%57%33%76%
hy4-preview93%100%87%53%28%74%
grok-4.7100%93%90%50%28%74%
kimi-k386%89%92%53%22%72%
particle-186%96%92%43%22%71%
muse-spark-open93%96%85%50%17%71%
qwen3.8-flash100%93%77%53%22%70%
deepseek-v4-pro93%93%87%37%22%68%
glm-5.3100%86%90%43%6%67%
minimax-m3.1-flash86%86%82%57%11%67%
muse-spark-1.386%93%90%33%11%66%
gpt-6-luna86%93%85%37%11%65%
glm-5.3-flash100%89%82%37%0%64%
step-5-preview86%93%67%23%17%57%
Open weights

mistral-large-4 leads open weights

78% of tasks solved, ranked #10 overall, at $3.04 per solved task.

  1. 1mistral-large-4open78%
  2. 2deepseek-v4.1-flashopen77%
  3. 3hy4-previewopen74%
  4. 4kimi-k3open72%
  5. 5muse-spark-openopen71%
  6. 6deepseek-v4-proopen68%
  7. 7glm-5.3open67%
  8. 8minimax-m3.1-flashopen67%
  9. 9glm-5.3-flashopen64%
  10. 10step-5-previewopen57%
All data

Everything we measured

Click a column to sort. Filter by open weights. Tasks solved needs every hidden test to pass; tests passed is partial credit. Averages per task unless noted.

#Model
1claude-opus-5-5Anthropic92%96%8.5s76199.5m1.5M20k100%$0.93
2claude-fable-5.1Anthropic89%95%8.6s683212.4m2.8M40k100%$3.48
3gemini-4-argonGoogle88%95%5.6s264315.5m5.2M58k87%$2.14
4claude-sonnet-5-5Anthropic88%97%4.5s129139.5m0.9M17k99%$0.52
5gpt-6-astraOpenAI88%97%6.1s263011.7m1.4M6k100%$2.11
6gpt-6.1-solOpenAI87%97%5.4s292811.5m1.3M6k100%$0.26
7gpt-6.1-terraOpenAI83%96%4.7s36326.3m1.5M7k100%$0.16
8claude-haiku-5-5Anthropic81%94%4.7s186205.4m1.7M36k100%$0.11
9kimi-k3.1-proMoonshot81%92%10.3s253711.8m2.9M13k96%$0.85
10mistral-large-4Mistralopen78%89%3.1s874710.6m3.4M30k0%$2.36
11deepseek-v4.1-flashDeepSeekopen77%85%2.3s1524516.5m3.6M116k97%$0.31
12gpt-6-solOpenAI76%94%3.2s483410.7m1.6M6k100%$0.54
13hy4-previewTencentopen74%83%7.0s296045.3m4.2M52k97%$0.38
14grok-4.7xAI74%88%3.6s593510.1m2.5M13k86%$1.71
15kimi-k3Moonshotopen72%89%6.2s394211.8m2.8M16k96%$1.72
16particle-1Particle71%87%2.0s232405.6m2.6M39k87%$0.19
17muse-spark-openMetaopen71%88%3.8s64344.4m3.1M13k95%$0.61
18qwen3.8-flashAlibaba70%84%5.7s493911.9m2.4M19k97%$0.05
19deepseek-v4-proDeepSeekopen68%84%4.9s614532.2m3.6M71k94%$1.82
20glm-5.3Zhipuopen67%78%2.4s875022.7m3.4M95k96%$1.46
21minimax-m3.1-flashMiniMaxopen67%83%4.2s1856620.4m4.4M196k98%$0.37
22muse-spark-1.3Meta66%79%3.4s1533111.2m2.3M91k85%$0.99
23gpt-6-lunaOpenAI65%84%4.1s704711.6m2.6M19k100%$0.05
24glm-5.3-flashZhipuopen64%73%1.0s1325311.4m3.3M48k97%$0.24
25step-5-previewStepFunopen57%74%5.1s124217.9m2.2M11k94%$0.28
Method

How the benchmark works

The tasks

129 real changes from our own Go backend: 14 easy, 28 medium, 39 hard, 30 extra hard and 18 extreme. They are private, so no model has seen them in training.

The harness

Every model gets the same coding agent, the same tools (bash, read, edit, write), the same sandboxed repo and a budget of 80 turns. All traffic goes through Requesty, so every model is called the same way.

The scoring

A task counts as solved only when the hidden tests written for it pass and the existing tests still pass. The model never sees the hidden tests. Runs where the model read the answer are flagged and checked.

  • Speed is measured end to end through Requesty from a single region, so it includes provider queueing and network time.
  • Some providers do not count hidden reasoning in output tokens, so throughput for those models (notably the GPT family) reads lower than the work done.
  • Prices are list prices per million tokens on the cheapest Requesty provider for that model. Cost per task is what each run cost us, including retries. Benchmarked is the date the run finished; for runs before October 20 it is the date the results were published.
  • Updated 2026-10-29. Only models with all 129 tasks completed are shown. Open weights follows the Requesty model catalogue.