filters

none

loading

models

loading

reading catalog

leaders

benchmarks
Top models across the intelligence, coding and reasoning benchmarks. One row per model family.
#modelintelcodinggpqa
1claude-fable-5.153.481.693.7%
2gpt-6-astra52.876.996.1%
3claude-opus-550.778.093.2%
4claude-fable-549.776.592.6%
5gpt-5.6-sol47.177.494.1%
6grok-4.644.476.894.9%
7gemini-3.8-flash @eu41.276.395.3%
8gemini-3.1-pro-preview:flex30.468.894.1%

Scores from Artificial Analysis. One row per model family, using the lab's own endpoint where it exists. The set is the union of each column's top five, so a specialist keeps its row and shows a gap elsewhere. All rankings

notes

reference

212 models 33 providers, one endpoint

Every model in the table is reachable through one OpenAI-compatible base URL. Change the model string, keep the rest of your code. Requesty routes the call, retries on another provider when one degrades, and passes through provider pricing with no per-token markup.

Prices come from the providers. Latency, throughput and error rates are measured on production traffic through the router, not quoted from a datasheet.

The catalog is wider than chat. The same key and the same base URL reach 46 more models on the other OpenAI-compatible paths, 15 embedding, 10 image, 12 speech and 9 transcription, which the api switch above the table lists with their own columns. Each is priced the way its provider charges it: per token for embeddings, per character or per token for text to speech, per minute of audio for transcription. Those figures compare within a tab, which is why they get one.

The cheapest paid input in this catalog is $0.02 per million tokens and the dearest is $30.00, a spread of 1500 times. Picking the right endpoint for a job is worth more than any prompt optimisation, which is why this page exists.

catalog

models
212
endpoints
682
beyond chat
15 embedding, 10 image, 12 speech and 9 transcription
providers
33
labs
31
free tier
12
max context
2M
price spread
1500x

questions 12

How many AI models can I access through Requesty?
Requesty routes to 212 models across 33 providers, 682 deployable endpoints in total, including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, AWS Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, Google Vertex AI, DeepSeek, Meta Llama, xAI Grok, Mistral, Moonshot Kimi, Alibaba Qwen, Zhipu GLM and MiniMax. Use any of them through a single OpenAI-compatible API.
Does Requesty charge markup on top of provider pricing?
No. Requesty passes through exactly what the upstream provider charges. You pay the same per-token rate as going direct to OpenAI, Anthropic or Google, and you get smart routing, automatic failover, prompt caching, analytics, and a single unified API included. Requesty makes money on a small platform fee for enterprise features, not on per-token markup.
What is the difference between a model and an endpoint?
A model is the weights a lab trained, like Claude Sonnet or Qwen3 Coder. An endpoint is one provider serving that model in one region, written provider/model@region. The same model often has a dozen endpoints at different prices and speeds, which is why this catalog can group 682 endpoints into 212 models. Expand any row to see every deployment of that model.
Which model is best for coding?
On SWE-Bench Verified (the most realistic coding benchmark, based on real GitHub issues) GPT-5.2 Codex, Claude Opus 4.7 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 currently lead. MiniMax M2.5 is the strongest open-weights option. See the leaders table above for live rankings, and each model detail page for full benchmark charts.
Which model is best for reasoning and math?
For graduate-level reasoning (GPQA Diamond), GPT-5.4, Grok 4 and Claude Opus 4.7 lead the pack. For math (AIME, MATH benchmarks), GPT-5.4 and Grok 4 currently top the charts, with DeepSeek R1 offering strong performance at a fraction of the price.
What is the longest context window available?
The largest context window in this catalog is 2M tokens, enough for whole-codebase analysis or long document reasoning. Note that effective quality often degrades past 128K tokens; prompt caching, supported on many models, is usually a better approach for repeated long context.
Are there free AI models I can use?
Yes, 12 endpoints on Requesty have a zero-cost tier, including several Llama variants and DeepSeek models via third-party hosts. They are ideal for prototyping and development. Use the free filter in the explorer above.
Can I use embedding, image, speech and transcription models too?
Yes. Alongside the chat catalog the router serves 46 models on the other OpenAI-compatible paths: 15 embedding, 10 image, 12 speech and 9 transcription. Embeddings go to POST /v1/embeddings, image generation to POST /v1/images/generations, text to speech to POST /v1/audio/speech and transcription to POST /v1/audio/transcriptions, all on the same base URL and the same key. Use the api switch above the table to see them, each priced the way its provider charges it: per token for embeddings, per character or per token for text to speech, and per minute of audio for Whisper.
How do I switch between models in my code?
Requesty is OpenAI-SDK compatible. Point base_url to "https://router.requesty.ai/v1", set your API key, and change the "model" parameter to any supported model ID (e.g. "anthropic/claude-opus-4-7", "openai/gpt-5.2", "google/gemini-2.5-pro"). No library changes needed. The same code works across providers.
Is my data private? Is it used for training?
Most major providers (Anthropic, Vertex AI, Azure OpenAI, AWS Bedrock) do not use API data for training by default. OpenAI offers zero-retention deployments via enterprise tiers. Each model detail page shows the specific data retention and training policy for that provider. Requesty itself never uses your data for training.
Can I get regional deployments (EU, US, APAC)?
Yes. Models available through AWS Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, and Google Vertex AI can be pinned to specific regions (eu-west-1, us-east5, etc.) using the @region suffix. Useful for GDPR, HIPAA, and data residency requirements. Filter by region in the explorer to see all options.
How are benchmark scores calculated?
Benchmark scores shown on Requesty are sourced from official model cards, Artificial Analysis, and public leaderboards (LiveBench, SWE-Bench, Vellum). Scores measure specific skills and do not capture every aspect of model quality. Always test on your own workload. Each model detail page links the canonical benchmark sources.
212 models682 endpoints46 embedding, image and audio33 providers12 freeprice spread 1500xno markuprebuilt daily