gpt-6-lunaOpenAI
- endpoints
- 7
- regions
- 6
- best tok/s
- 135
- api
- chat
- released
- September 2026
- eu routing
- available
capabilities 6/8
The same weights cost 2.4x more on microsoft azure ai than on openai. That is what the endpoints table is for.
| # | flags | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Global | 1.1M | $0.05 | $0.25 | $0.0050 | 2.56s | 82.0 | - | no-train | |
| 2 | Global | 1.1M | $0.10 | $0.50 | $0.01 | 2.56s | 82.0 | - | no-train | |
| 3 | eastus2 | 1.1M | $0.10 | $0.50 | $0.01 | 1.84s | 135.0 | - | zdr | |
| 4 | francecentral | 1.1M | $0.12 | $0.60 | $0.01 | 1.84s | 135.0 | - | zdr | |
| 5 | germanywestcentral | 1.1M | $0.12 | $0.60 | $0.01 | 1.84s | 135.0 | - | zdr | |
| 6 | swedencentral | 1.1M | $0.12 | $0.60 | $0.01 | 1.84s | 135.0 | - | zdr | |
| 7 | westeurope | 1.1M | $0.12 | $0.60 | $0.01 | 1.84s | 135.0 | - | zdr |
| provider | now | low | high | change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Azure AI | 1.84s | 712ms | 3.07s | +208% |
| OpenAI | 2.56s | 832ms | 3.66s | +172% |
median wait before the first token lands. this is the number a user feels, and it moves with provider load through the day.
Lines are steps: each sample is one week of traffic held flat, not a slide from the week before. Click a name in the key to drop it from the plot. Measured through Nov 2.
| eval | Score as a share of 100 | /100 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 54.6 | |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 38.5 | |
| Intelligence Index | 27.8 | |
| 3 evals | mean | 40.3 |
Scores from Artificial Analysis and public leaderboards, normalised to 100. Bar colour is the band, not the rank: green 80 and up, blue 55 and up, amber 30 and up. Benchmarks measure narrow skills, so test on your own workload before committing. Released 2026-09-22.
gpt-6-lunarequesty routes this id across every provider serving gpt-6-luna, picking on price and health and failing over automatically. the id stays valid when a provider changes underneath it
Base url is https://router.requesty.ai/v1 for every id here. One key reaches the whole catalog.
from openai import OpenAI client = OpenAI( api_key="YOUR_REQUESTY_API_KEY", base_url="https://router.requesty.ai/v1",) response = client.chat.completions.create( model="gpt-6-luna", messages=[ {"role": "user", "content": "Explain quantum computing in one paragraph."}, ],) print(response.choices[0].message.content)
Change the base url, use your Requesty key, set the model to any id in the call pane. Existing OpenAI SDK code needs no other edit, and the same key reaches every other model in the catalog, so switching later is a one-parameter change. Browse all models
GPT-6 Luna is the fast, cost-efficient model in OpenAI's GPT-6 series, positioned below GPT-6 Sol. It is suited for high-volume and latency-sensitive workloads such as chat, classification, and lightweight agentic tasks, and at higher reasoning effort it can take on complex software engineering and computer-use tasks that previously called for a Sol-tier model.
questions 7
Which providers serve gpt-6-luna?
How much does gpt-6-luna cost?
Is gpt-6-luna open weights?
What is the context window of gpt-6-luna?
Which provider is fastest for gpt-6-luna?
How do I use gpt-6-luna with the OpenAI SDK?
Should I call gpt-6-luna by its managed id or a provider id?
more from openai 6
| model | context | from /M | providers |
|---|---|---|---|
| gpt-6.1-terra | 1.1M | $0.50 | 2 |
| gpt-6.1-sol | 1.1M | $1.00 | 2 |
| gpt-6-sol | 1.1M | $1.00 | 2 |
| gpt-6-astra | 1.1M | $5.00 | 2 |
| gpt-5.6-luna | 1.1M | $0.10 | 3 |
| gpt-5.6-terra | 1.1M | $1.00 | 3 |
route gpt-6-luna through one endpoint
One key for 2 providers on this model and 600+ others. No markup on provider prices, automatic failover, caching built in. Weekly aggregates in the measured pane come from production traffic routed through Requesty, one line per provider on a shared axis. Methodology
