kimi-k2.7-codeMoonshot AI
- endpoints
- 4
- regions
- 2
- best tok/s
- 145
- api
- chat
- released
- June 2026
- eu routing
- available
capabilities 5/8
The same weights cost 1.7x more on tensorx ltd. than on inceptron ab. That is what the endpoints table is for.
| # | flags | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EU | 256K | $0.75 | $3.50 | $0.20 | 700ms | 106.0 | zdr | ||
| 2 | Global | 262K | $0.95 | $4.00 | $0.19 | 1.32s | 96.0 | zdr | ||
| 3 | Global | 262K | $0.95 | $4.00 | $0.19 | 2.49s | 35.0 | - | zdr | |
| 4 | EU | 262K | $1.25 | $4.50 | $0.31 | 859ms | 145.0 | zdr |
| provider | now | low | high | change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inceptron AB | 700ms | 423ms | 1.34s | -68% |
| TensorX Ltd. | 859ms | 990ms | 2.11s | -13% |
| Fireworks AI | 1.32s | 1.09s | 1.54s | +8.6% |
| Parasail | 2.44s | 1.22s | 3.06s | -32% |
| Moonshot AI | 2.49s | 2.00s | 6.42s | +179% |
median wait before the first token lands. this is the number a user feels, and it moves with provider load through the day.
Lines are steps: each sample is one week of traffic held flat, not a slide from the week before. Click a name in the key to drop it from the plot. Measured through Sep 12.
| eval | Score as a share of 100 | /100 |
|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench | 90.1 | |
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6 | |
| Coding Index | 60.8 | |
| SciCode | 47.8 | |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 44.7 | |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 35.0 | |
| Intelligence Index | 26.3 | |
| 7 evals | mean | 56.3 |
Scores from Artificial Analysis and public leaderboards, normalised to 100. Bar colour is the band, not the rank: green 80 and up, blue 55 and up, amber 30 and up. Benchmarks measure narrow skills, so test on your own workload before committing. Released 2026-06-12.
kimi-k2.7-coderequesty routes this id across every provider serving kimi-k2.7-code, picking on price and health and failing over automatically. the id stays valid when a provider changes underneath it
Base url is https://router.requesty.ai/v1 for every id here. One key reaches the whole catalog.
from openai import OpenAI client = OpenAI( api_key="YOUR_REQUESTY_API_KEY", base_url="https://router.requesty.ai/v1",) response = client.chat.completions.create( model="kimi-k2.7-code", messages=[ {"role": "user", "content": "Explain quantum computing in one paragraph."}, ],) print(response.choices[0].message.content)
Change the base url, use your Requesty key, set the model to any id in the call pane. Existing OpenAI SDK code needs no other edit, and the same key reaches every other model in the catalog, so switching later is a one-parameter change. Browse all models
Kimi K2.7 Code is a coding-focused model in Moonshot AI's Kimi K2 family, built to complete end-to-end programming tasks reliably over long contexts. It uses a native multimodal mixture-of-experts architecture that accepts text and image input, and it always operates in a thinking mode, preserving full reasoning content across multi-turn conversations. With a 256K-token context window, it targets long-horizon coding, agentic task decomposition, and multi-turn dialogue. The model activates 32B parameters out of roughly 1T total.
questions 7
Which providers serve kimi-k2.7-code?
How much does kimi-k2.7-code cost?
Is kimi-k2.7-code open weights?
What is the context window of kimi-k2.7-code?
Which provider is fastest for kimi-k2.7-code?
How do I use kimi-k2.7-code with the OpenAI SDK?
Should I call kimi-k2.7-code by its managed id or a provider id?
more from moonshot ai 5
| model | context | from /M | providers |
|---|---|---|---|
| kimi-k3 | 1.0M | $3.00 | 5 |
| kimi-k2.6 | 262K | $0.60 | 5 |
| kimi-k2.5 | 262K | $0.45 | 3 |
| kimi-k2 | 262K | $0.60 | 1 |
| kimi-k2-instruct | 131K | $0.57 | 1 |
route kimi-k2.7-code through one endpoint
One key for 4 providers on this model and 600+ others. No markup on provider prices, automatic failover, caching built in. Weekly aggregates in the measured pane come from production traffic routed through Requesty, one line per provider on a shared axis. Methodology
